Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons
American Conservative Union
American Public
Health Association
Family
Research Council
International
Autism-Europe
Nat'l
Gulf War Resource Center
Nat'l
Institute of Military Justice
The
Eagle Forum
The
Patrick Henry Center
Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons
| "The military and scientific
community should give consideration to the development
and use of a newer, more effective vaccine. Several are
in late-stage development which are more effective than
the current vaccine but do not cause toxicity as reported
by the Army's own Bacteriology Division at the Army
Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Ft.
Detrick, Maryland (Journal of Biological Chemistry, 264[32]:19103-7,
1989). A careful examination of the nation's vaccine
policies, with respect to both military and civilian
populations, is overdue. Some issues are scientific, to
be sure, but basic constitutional rights and fundamental
premises of medical ethics are also at stake." Association
of American Physicians and Surgeons written testimony to
the House Government Reform Committee 1 Apr 1999. For
full text of AAPS' testimony click here : http://www.snavely.digiweb.com/testimony/anthrax.htm
Back to top
|
American Conservative Union (www.conservative.org)
American
Conservative Union
"We recommend that the controversial decision of the
Clinton Administration to implement anthrax vaccinations
to members of the services without informed consent be
suspended until the next administration has had an
opportunity to review it."Click
here for source (Scroll to the end of the document,
then back six paragraphs)
Back to top
|
American Public Health
Association (www.apha.org)
- Policy Statement #9930
Adopted by the Governing Council of the American
Public Health Association, November 10, 1999. The
APHA:
1. Urges the
US Department of Defense to delay any
further immunization against anthrax
using the current vaccine or at least to
make immunization voluntary; and2. Urges that a
commission of military and non-military
public health experts be formed to review
the evidence for effectiveness and safety
of the current vaccine and the time at
which an improved vaccine may be
available, and to make recommendations
about the continuation of the current
immunization program.
For full
text see: http://www.apha.org/legislative/policy/99policy.pdf
"This policy statement is based upon the
controversy in the medical literature about the
efficacy of the vaccine; the lack of valid
monitoring of its potential adverse effects; and
the stance taken by the United Kingdom and other
allies that they receipt of the vaccine remain
voluntary among their troops."
-- Mohammed N. Akhter, MD, MPH
Executive Director
May 23, 2000
For full text of APHA's letter click here
Back to top
|
Family Research Council (www.frc.org)
- "FRC's research
on the issue has concluded that AVIP [DoD's
anthrax vaccine policy] is not necessary and for
the sake of military personnel retention should
be suspended pending, as a minimum, an
independent study of the effects of the vaccine
on humans. FRC believes sufficient historical
evidence exists to suggest that biological
weapons, such as anthrax, would only be used
against a peer or superior military power as a
weapon of last resort, just like nuclear weapons.
Additionally, the military has a range of other
options (e.g., special operations, stand-off
penetrating munitions, passive and active defense
programs, and intelligence monitoring) that when
taken collectively is an impressive deterrent
capability. Therefore, the threat of anthrax can
be deterred."
For full text
of FRC's detailed policy paper see: http://www.frc.org/military/mp99k1mf.html
- 5
Back to top
|
International Autism-Europe
- " The case of
MAJOR SONNIE BATES has attracted considerable
media attention over here. The action of the US
military in mandating the use of the experimental
Anthrax vaccine for your personnel is contrasted
against the actions of our own [UK] government
which strongly encourages and advises its use but
will not enforce it...
- "...Given these
circumstances, it is my opinion that it would be
foolhardy in the extreme for Major Bates to
accept mandatory vaccination. Given that he
already has a child with autism and, therefore,
the likelihood of a genetic predisposition he
could ill afford to take such risks. Were serious
problems to arise, Major Bates' son's future
would be in severe jeopardy."
-- Letter to Secretary of
Defense William Cohen
from Paul Shattock, Honorable Secretary,
International Autism-Europe
Back to top
|
Nat'l Gulf War Resource
Center (www.ngwrc.org)
- Nat'l Gulf War
Resource Center Resolution 99-9
"THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED THAT the National Gulf War Resource
Center remain firmly opposed to all Department of
Defense programs, policies, and projects which
mandate, without consent, the forcible
administration of any investigational new drug,
and of the forcible administration of any drug,
vaccination, medication, or medical product or
program which has not yet been fully tested for
potential health effects, including long-term
health effects, to include the current Anthrax
Vaccination Program (AVIP);"
"AND BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED that the National Gulf War
Resource Center commit its full resources to
working to end the mandatory Anthrax Vaccination
Program until such time as the AVIP has been
formally ended, or the vaccination has been
proved safe in both the long-term and short-tem
through credible research; and that such work
shall not be deemed complete until one of these
two conditions has been satisfactorily met."
For complete text see: http://www.ngwrc.org/About/Resolutions/99resolutions.htm#_Toc464612331
Back to top
|
The Eagle Forum www.eagleforum.org
- "It adds up to a
shocking betrayal of the men and women in the U.S.
Armed Services. Since the Pentagon is in denial
and coverup, we can thank CBS 60 Minutes for its
February 6th expose of the case of Major Sonnie
Bates and thank Rep. Christopher Shays' (R-CT)
Subcommittee on National Security of the House
Government Reform Committee for its scathing report on the vaccine released
February 17th...." "...The mandatory
anthrax vaccination of 2.4 million members of the
Armed Services should be terminated immediately.
And all those who have had the courage to speak
out against this policy, which doesn't pass the
common-sense test, should be restored to duty and
their convictions and punishment expunged from
their records."
For complete
text:
Click here
Back to top
|
The
Patrick Henry Center(www.patrickhenrycenter.org)
- ""...As
Americans, we assume that our service members are
more than robots. We trust our military leaders
to act in our best interest whatever the
challenge of the moment. However, this implies
that the chain of command is as united in its
support for the troops as it is in its loyalty to
superiors. Unfortunately, the past seven years
under the politically self-serving Clinton
administration has produced a deterioration in
authority and morale which has permeated through
all levels of the military. Eventually, every
officer and NCO faces the choice of following an
order he believes in his heart to be wrong - or
suffering the consequences. Often it is a very
lonely decision. Such was the case with Major
Bates, who, after reviewing all of the evidence
available to him decided he must refuse the shot
until his side of the story was heard. All he
asked for was justice, but it was not to be found
in the Clinton-era military." Gary
Aldrich, President February 17, 2000 "
For full text:
Click
here
Back to top
|
National
Institute of Military Justice
- "Anthrax: www.majorbates.com.
NIMJ note: this is a very impressive site,
regardless of where you stand on the issue."
--
Military Justice Gazette, No. 78, June 2000
(NIMJ is a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation
founded in 1991. For information or to subscribe contact:
efidell@feldesmantucker.com
(Eugene R. Fidell), kjbarry @erols.com (Kevin J. Barry).
Back to top
|